WELL and Fitwel water

WELL and Fitwel water technical input

WELL and Fitwel are separate healthy-building ratings. When a project targets one or both, we prepare the water evidence your certification lead needs: quality, drinking-water access and water management, mapped to each scheme on its own terms.

Drinking-water access
Water quality
Water management
Technical input

Get started

Send us your drawings and whether the target is WELL, Fitwel or both. We'll confirm the scope and the fee.

We'll reply within one business day

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
We've worked with pretty great people at some awesome companies. here are some of them:
Ratio Consultants logoHansen Partnership logoOFFICE logo

This page is part of Water Design. Building-performance evidence across energy, daylight, comfort and materials sits on the WELL, Fitwel and LBC certification support page.

Send the drawings, project address, whether you are pursuing WELL, Fitwel or both, the version, and the name of your certification lead. We work to the version your project is registered under. For Fitwel, tell us whether the pathway is before occupancy or after the building is in use.

We provide technical input. Each scheme owner makes the certification decision.

What you receive

  • A mapping of the water items that belong to WELL, to Fitwel, or to neither.
  • Design coordination notes for drinking-water points of use, filtration and maintenance access, and water-management responsibilities.
  • A testing-scope or management-program outline your lead can take to the wider consultant team, where those items are in scope.
  • Clear assumptions and limits, so one scheme's language is not copied into the other.

Meeting a WELL water item does not mean a Fitwel water item is met, or the reverse.

How the two schemes differ on water

WELL

WELL, run by the International WELL Building Institute, treats water mainly as occupant health: the quality of water supplied for different uses, how that quality is maintained, and how drinking water is provided. Current public work is under WELL v2. Numeric limits sit in the official feature text; we work to those current requirements rather than reprinting them here.

Fitwel

Fitwel is a different rating, with its own scorecards and versions. For new work, Fitwel v3 is the current version; v2.1 remains available for eligible projects. Its water items typically cover drinking-water access, water-quality testing and a water-management program.

Stormwater quality for council or Green Star Waterway Protection is a different brief. See Blue Factor reports and low-impact development design.

If the project also includes the Living Building Challenge Water Petal, that work is covered on Living Building Challenge Water Petal advisory.

Design decisions that change the result

Drinking-water points, filtration access and maintenance responsibility need to appear in the architectural and hydraulic packages while those drawings can still move. A placeholder hydraulic mark-up is usually not enough evidence for either scheme.

Reuse of rainwater or recycled water may support a water strategy, but it is a separate design and approvals question. We coordinate that discussion with the rainwater and potable-water work; we do not treat a tank as proof that a health-rating water item is met.

[Sound familiar]

Sound familiar?

The hydraulic mark-up is still a placeholder.

A placeholder is usually not enough evidence for either scheme. Drinking-water points, filtration access and maintenance responsibility need to be on the drawings while they can still move.

We met the WELL item, so Fitwel is covered.

It isn't. Meeting a WELL water item does not mean a Fitwel water item is met, or the reverse. We map each scheme on its own terms.

The rainwater tank should tick the water box.

A tank is not proof that a health-rating water item is met. Reuse is a separate design and approvals question.

How it works

Send the scheme

Send the scheme, version and drawings.

01

We split the schemes

We separate the WELL and Fitwel requests and say what the current design already supports.

02

You get the water input

We document the water input your lead can include. Timeframes are confirmed at quote.

03

Frequently asked questions

Are the WELL and Fitwel water requirements the same?

expand

No. They are separate healthy-building ratings. Meeting a WELL water item does not mean a Fitwel water item is met, or the reverse.

Do you certify the project?

expand

No. We provide technical input. Each scheme owner makes the certification decision.

Which version do you work to?

expand

The version your project is registered under. For Fitwel, tell us whether the pathway is before occupancy or after the building is in use.

Does a rainwater tank meet a water item?

expand

We do not treat a tank as proof that a health-rating water item is met. Reuse of rainwater or recycled water is a separate design and approvals question.

What needs to be on the drawings?

expand

Drinking-water points, filtration access and maintenance responsibility, in the architectural and hydraulic packages while those drawings can still move. A placeholder hydraulic mark-up is usually not enough evidence for either scheme.

Does this cover stormwater for council or Green Star?

expand

No. Stormwater quality for council or Green Star Waterway Protection is a different brief. For council stormwater, see Blue Factor reports and low-impact development design. For Green Star, see Green Star water credits.

Get in touch

Send us your drawings, the project address, and whether the target is WELL, Fitwel or both.

[start with makao]
Weave sustainability into
your next project
By the time a report is due, most of the decisions it tests are already drawn and priced. Bring us in while they can still change, and the report confirms the design instead of reshaping it.
Request a fee proposal
Kelvin Mureithi - MakaoLalaine Valencia
send us a message