Life cycle assessment

Upfront carbon shows what it took to build. An LCA shows the rest.

Upfront carbon stops at practical completion. Replacement cycles, maintenance and operating energy come after, and they can change which design option performs best. We model the full life cycle to EN 15978, report Module D separately, and compare your options on the same basis so the choice holds over the building's life.

EN 15978
Modules A–D
Option comparison

Get started

Send us your drawings or cost plan.

We'll reply within one business day

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
We've worked with pretty great people at some awesome companies. here are some of them:
Ratio Consultants logoHansen Partnership logoOFFICE logo

[Why it matters]

Upfront carbon stops at practical completion. The building doesn't.

An Upfront Carbon Report counts emissions up to practical completion (modules A1–A5). That misses everything after handover.

A whole-of-life LCA covers the full life cycle and reports more than carbon. It's the right tool when you're comparing options with different lifespans, or when Green Star or an investor asks for full disclosure.

Replacement

Façade and services replacement.

Refurbishment

Refurbishment cycles.

Operation

Operational energy and water.

End of life

Demolition, and what can be recovered at end of life.

[What is a life cycle assessment?]

Upfront carbon vs LCA.

Upfront carbon is modules A1–A5 and carbon only. An LCA covers modules A–D and multiple environmental indicators.

Module D is reported separately, as EN 15978 requires, so benefits beyond the system boundary don't hide impacts within it.

Product-specific EPDs improve accuracy where they exist. Otherwise, industry-average data is used and documented.

Upfront Carbon Report

Life cycle modules A1–A5 (product and construction). Indicator: carbon (GWP). Typical question: how much carbon is locked in at completion, and how do we cut it? Green Star v1.1: Upfront Carbon Reduction.

Life Cycle Assessment

Life cycle modules A–D (product, construction, use, end of life, plus benefits beyond the system boundary). Indicators: multiple EN 15804+A2 impact indicators. Typical question: which option performs best over the building's life? Green Star v1.1: Impacts Disclosure (the same LCA can also support Upfront Carbon Reduction).

[What you receive]

What's included in a life cycle assessment

Goal and scope

Functional unit, service life, boundaries and modules.

Bill of materials

From drawings or the QS cost plan.

EPD and data selection

With Australian EPDs where available.

Use stage

Maintenance and replacement schedules, operational energy from our energy model, and water where in scope.

End of life and Module D

Benefits reported separately.

Option comparison

Structure, façade and services alternatives.

Report to EN 15978

And the Green Star submission template where relevant.

What we need from you

Drawings, specifications or the QS cost plan, and any existing upfront carbon model.

[When do you need an LCA?]

Sound familiar?

An LCA is the right tool when Green Star, an investor or a design decision needs the whole life of the building on the table.

Green Star Buildings v1.1

Projects targeting the Impacts Disclosure credit.

Green Star Buildings v1 projects

The Life Cycle Impacts credit compares the project with a reference building over the whole life cycle.

Option studies

Where lifespans differ. For example: façade systems with different replacement cycles, or refurbish against rebuild.

Investor and ESG reporting

Asking for whole-of-life embodied impacts.

“We did an upfront carbon report, and now Green Star wants full life cycle disclosure.”

We extend the same model to modules B, C and D, so you don't pay twice for the bill of materials.

“Refurbish or rebuild? The upfront numbers favour rebuild, but that can't be the full story.”

An LCA compares both over the same service life.

[How it works]

What happens after you send us your project.

Send us your design

Drawings, specifications or the QS cost plan, and any existing upfront carbon model.

01

We confirm scope and quote

Modules, indicators, service life and Green Star requirements. Fast-track timeframes are available case by case; timeframes are confirmed at quote.

02

We model

Bill of materials, EPDs, use-stage schedules and energy data from our modelling.

03

You get the report

EN 15978 report, option comparison and Green Star documentation.

04

Frequently asked questions

What's the difference between this and your Upfront Carbon Report?

expand

Upfront carbon is modules A1–A5 and carbon only. An LCA covers modules A–D and multiple environmental indicators.

Can one model serve both Green Star credits?

expand

Yes. An A–D LCA can support Upfront Carbon Reduction (A1–A5) and Impacts Disclosure.

Is Module D included in the total?

expand

It's reported separately, as EN 15978 requires, so benefits beyond the system boundary don't hide impacts within it.

Do we need EPDs for every product?

expand

No. Product-specific EPDs improve accuracy where they exist. Otherwise, industry-average data is used and documented.

[Why Makao]

One model from upfront carbon to whole-of-life

Connected to our energy model

For operational energy.

Reviewed by Kelvin Mureithi, Founder, Makao · Green Star Accredited Professional, ISAP, Engineers Australia member.

[start with makao]
Weave sustainability into
your next project
By the time a report is due, most of the decisions it tests are already drawn and priced. Bring us in while they can still change, and the report confirms the design instead of reshaping it.
Request a fee proposal
Kelvin Mureithi - MakaoLalaine Valencia
send us a message